Registry analysis

Statistics

A derived view of registry composition, historical change, infrastructure coverage, and evidence quality. These statistics describe reviewed records in Stable or Gone; they are not market rankings, scores, or investment recommendations.

Reviewed checkpoint
Asset denominator
112
History snapshots
15

Current checkpoint

Registry at a glance

Exact counts derived from the audited canonical registry and Registry v3 supporting records.

Total assets
112

Canonical stable assets

Operating
81

72.32% of assets

Constrained
14

12.5% of assets

Historical non-failure
8

7.14% of assets

Failed
6

5.36% of assets

Organizations
107

Canonical organization records

Events
187

Material historical events

Evidence
559

Evidence records

Lifecycle

Recorded lifecycle composition

Lifecycle groups keep operating, constrained, historical non-failure, and failed records distinct. Termination, migration, or rebranding is not silently rewritten as failure.

Operating81

72.32% of 112 assets

Constrained14

12.5% of 112 assets

Historical non-failure8

7.14% of 112 assets

Failed6

5.36% of 112 assets

Other3

2.68% of 112 assets

Canonical lifecycle statuses and shares of the asset denominator.
StatusCountShare
Active8172.32%
Restricted119.82%
Collapsed65.36%
Terminated32.68%
Unknown32.68%
Winding down32.68%
Inactive21.79%
Migrated21.79%
Rebranded10.89%

Classification

What the registry contains

Economic class, reference target, mechanism, governance, backing, and legal classifications are kept as separate analytical dimensions.

Asset class

Single-select economic classification.

Stablecoin99
88.39%
Stable Value Asset6
5.36%
Yield Bearing Stable Receipt4
3.57%
Tokenized Commodity2
1.79%
Experimental Stabilization Asset1
0.89%

Reference target

What the asset is designed to reference.

Fiat107
95.54%
Commodity2
1.79%
Index2
1.79%
Floating1
0.89%

Stabilization mechanism

Primary recorded stabilization mechanism.

Issuer Redemption53
47.32%
Hybrid23
20.54%
Overcollateralized Vault16
14.29%
Protocol Arbitrage9
8.04%
Algorithmic Supply5
4.46%
Delta Neutral2
1.79%
Fund Share Valuation2
1.79%
Rebasing Or Repricing2
1.79%

Governance model

Recorded governance structure.

Centralized53
47.32%
Dao Governed27
24.11%
Protocol Governed26
23.21%
Hybrid6
5.36%

Backing type

Multi-select: percentages may exceed 100% in total.

Backing-type presence across assets.
Backing typeCountShare
Mixed3833.93%
Stablecoin Collateral3228.57%
Crypto Collateral3127.68%
Cash2925.89%
Bank Deposits2320.54%
Government Securities1916.96%
Tokenized Fund1210.71%
Other87.14%
Unbacked54.46%
Unknown43.57%
Commodity21.79%
Private Credit21.79%
Cash Equivalents10.89%
Receivables10.89%
Secured Loans10.89%

Fiat reference currency

Separate distribution for assets with fiat reference targets.

Recorded fiat reference currencies.
CurrencyCountShare
USD8175.7%
EUR1110.28%
JPY32.8%
AED10.93%
AUD10.93%
BRL10.93%
CAD10.93%
CHF10.93%
GBP10.93%
IDR10.93%
NZD10.93%
PHP10.93%
SGD10.93%
TRY10.93%
ZAR10.93%

Legal classification

Jurisdiction-scoped legal classifications remain distinct from economic asset class.

Recorded legal classifications.
ClassificationCountShare
Protocol Asset4035.71%
Unclassified3228.57%
Fiat Backed Stablecoin3127.68%
E Money Token87.14%
Fund Share10.89%
Security Token10.89%

Historical analysis

Events, transitions, and failures

Event history is shown separately from failure analysis so incidents, migrations, regulatory actions, orderly wind-downs, and collapses do not collapse into one category.

Events by year

Material canonical events, grouped by recorded event year.

20187
20195
202010
202120
202226
202319
202427
202526
202631
unknown16

Event types

Exact distribution of canonical event types.

Canonical event types.
Event typeCountShare
Launch7339.04%
Status Review126.42%
Protocol Upgrade73.74%
Protocol Model Update63.21%
Launched52.67%
Depeg42.14%
Migration42.14%
Rebrand42.14%
Redemption Change42.14%
Security Incident42.14%
Mainnet Availability Report31.6%
Regulatory Action31.6%
Shutdown Effective31.6%
Announcement21.07%
Chain Expansion21.07%
Exchange Adoption Context21.07%
Governance Change Proposed21.07%
Issuer Transition21.07%
Launch Or Issuer Context21.07%
Major Depeg21.07%
Peg Failure21.07%
Protocol Exploit21.07%
Security Incident Update21.07%
Token Migration21.07%
Wind Down Announced21.07%
Acquired10.53%
Chain Halt Context10.53%
Collapse10.53%
Depeg Recovery Context10.53%
Erroneous Mint Incident10.53%
Exchange Phaseout10.53%
Exploit10.53%
Governance Transition10.53%
Issuer Freeze10.53%
Liquidity Incentive Start10.53%
Market Stress Liquidation Event10.53%
Network Launch10.53%
Peg Failure And Protocol Supersession10.53%
Predecessor Trial Lifecycle10.53%
Production Security Program Start10.53%
Protocol Launch Or Lifecycle Context10.53%
Protocol Transition10.53%
Protocol Upgrade Announced10.53%
Protocol V2 Public Launch10.53%
Rebrand And Classification Change10.53%
Rebrand Or Lifecycle Transition10.53%
Recovery10.53%
Regulatory10.53%
Regulatory Settlement10.53%
Reserve Change10.53%
Reserve Intervention Context10.53%
Reserve Verification Termination10.53%
Restricted V2 Launch Phase10.53%
Testing10.53%
Wind Down10.53%
Wind Down And Final Redemption10.53%

Lifecycle transitions

Current canonical transition-state counts.

Collapses
6
Orderly Wind Downs
3
Terminations
3
Inactive Unresolved
2
Migrations
2
Rebrands
1

Event detail kinds

Typed supporting event-detail records.

Launch
71
Migration
31
Other
30
Governance Change
12
Security Incident
8
Termination
8
Depeg
7
Reserve Change
7
Redemption Change
6
Regulatory
6
Issuer Control
1

Depeg outcomes

Recovery outcome where a reviewed depeg detail exists.

Collapsed
3
Not Recovered
3
Recovered
1

Failure analysis

6 failed assets

Failure breakdowns use the canonical failed lifecycle group. Backing type is multi-select and is not a mutually exclusive composition.

By stabilization mechanism

By stabilization mechanism.
CategoryCountShare
Algorithmic Supply466.67%
Hybrid116.67%
Overcollateralized Vault116.67%

By backing type

By backing type.
CategoryCountShare
Unbacked466.67%
Stablecoin Collateral233.33%
Crypto Collateral116.67%
Mixed116.67%
Other116.67%

By governance model

By governance model.
CategoryCountShare
Protocol Governed6100%

By launch year

By launch year.
CategoryCountShare
2020233.33%
2021233.33%
Unknown233.33%

By collapse year

By collapse year.
CategoryCountShare
Unknown583.33%
2022116.67%

Deployments

Chain and deployment structure

Deployment rows and distinct asset reach are shown separately. A multi-chain asset is still one canonical asset.

Total deployments
174
Assets with deployments
112
Freeze capability known
1
Blacklist capability known
1
Control capability unknown
174

Chain coverage

Deployment count and distinct asset count by chain.

Ethereum81 assets
83
Solana13 assets
14
Base8 assets
8
Polygon8 assets
8
BNB Chain5 assets
5
Arbitrum4 assets
4
Source Review Needed4 assets
4
Arbitrum One3 assets
3
TRON2 assets
3
XRP Ledger3 assets
3
Celo2 assets
2
Concordium2 assets
2
Multi Chain2 assets
2
Plasma2 assets
2
Acala1 assets
1
Agoric1 assets
1
Algorand1 assets
1
Avalanche1 assets
1
Berachain1 assets
1
Bitcoin Omni Layer1 assets
1
Blast1 assets
1
BNB Smart Chain1 assets
1
Bnb Smart Chain1 assets
1
Cardano1 assets
1
Ethereum1 assets
1
Gnosis1 assets
1
Gnosis Chain1 assets
1
HyperEVM1 assets
1
Hyperliquid HyperCore1 assets
1
Kava1 assets
1
Kujira1 assets
1
Linea1 assets
1
Multi Chain Or Bridge Context1 assets
1
Multi Chain Or Protocol Context1 assets
1
NEAR1 assets
1
Noble1 assets
1
Optimism1 assets
1
Ronin1 assets
1
Rootstock1 assets
1
Solana1 assets
1
Stellar1 assets
1
Terra Classic1 assets
1
Waves1 assets
1
XDC Network1 assets
1
Zilliqa1 assets
1

Exact chain counts

Asset reach and deployment rows are separate measures.

Deployment records by chain.
ChainAssetsDeployments
Ethereum8183
Solana1314
Base88
Polygon88
BNB Chain55
Arbitrum44
Source Review Needed44
Arbitrum One33
TRON23
XRP Ledger33
Celo22
Concordium22
Multi Chain22
Plasma22
Acala11
Agoric11
Algorand11
Avalanche11
Berachain11
Bitcoin Omni Layer11
Blast11
BNB Smart Chain11
Bnb Smart Chain11
Cardano11
Ethereum11
Gnosis11
Gnosis Chain11
HyperEVM11
Hyperliquid HyperCore11
Kava11
Kujira11
Linea11
Multi Chain Or Bridge Context11
Multi Chain Or Protocol Context11
NEAR11
Noble11
Optimism11
Ronin11
Rootstock11
Solana11
Stellar11
Terra Classic11
Waves11
XDC Network11
Zilliqa11

Canonicality

Issuer Native
87
Native
49
Legacy
19
Canonical Bridge
10
Unknown
8
Synthetic
1

Deployment type

Issuer Supported Token
32
Issuer Native Token
27
Protocol Native Token
23
Issuer Native Fiat Token
9
Bridge Representation
7
Native Or Issuer Supported
7
Protocol Token
7
Native
6
Historical Issuer Supported Token
5
Historical Protocol Native Token
5
Issuer Supported
5
Canonical Issuance
4
Cross Chain Representation
3
Protocol Native Vault Share
3
Erc20
2
Historical Canonical Issuance
2
Native Historical
2
Protocol Asset
2
Protocol Native Asset
2
Protocol Supported Token
2
Bridge Or Protocol Extension
1
Bridged
1
Erc20 Or Issuer Supported
1
Historical Original Issuance
1
Issuer Native Tokenized Fund Share
1
Issuer Native Tokenized Note
1
Issuer Or Network Supported Token
1
Issuer Supported Native Token
1
Legacy Canonical Issuance
1
Legacy Native
1
Legacy Protocol Token
1
Linked Native Representation
1
Native Or Protocol Supported
1
Native Protocol Asset
1
Protocol Issued Synthetic
1
Protocol Issued Token
1
Related Savings Token
1
Spl Token
1
Trust Issued Token
1

Verification status

Unknown
119
Official Exact Identifier
26
Verified
22
Source Linked No Identifier
6
Explorer Exact Identifier
1

Organizations

Roles around stable assets

An organization may hold multiple roles. Role rows therefore describe relationship structure, not a mutually exclusive organization classification.

Organizations
107
Relationships
124
Recorded role types
7
Organization roles and their relationship, organization, and asset reach.
RoleRelationshipsOrganizationsAsset reach
Protocol Operator625462
Legal Issuer504249
Brand Owner555
Technology Provider333
Reserve Manager222
Custodian111
Other111

Data quality

Coverage, evidence depth, and freshness

These metrics describe registry completeness and review coverage. They are not safety, transparency, or risk scores for the underlying assets.

Coverage

Exact numerator, denominator, and coverage percentage.

Registry coverage metrics.
MetricCoverageShare
Classification112 / 112100%
Deployment112 / 112100%
Legal profile112 / 112100%
Reserve / redemption profile112 / 112100%
Reserve component112 / 112100%
Archive evidence387 / 55969.23%
Stable-asset relationship8 / 1127.14%

Evidence and known unknowns

Evidence depth and unresolved-state visibility remain explicit.

Average evidence per asset
4.98
Median evidence per asset
5
Known unknowns
325
High / critical unknowns
124
Assets with high / critical unknowns
67
Typed event details
187 / 187

Evidence depth

Number of evidence records attached per canonical asset.

5 Plus58
51.79%
2 453
47.32%
11
0.89%

Verification recency

Age bands derived from canonical `last_verified_at` values.

0 30 Days94
83.93%
31 90 Days18
16.07%

Checkpoint history

Reviewed snapshots only

History is append-only and records explicit reviewed checkpoints, not every deployment build.

Reviewed immutable statistics checkpoints.
RecordedAssetsEventsEvidence
2026-07-06100172502
2026-07-08102174508
2026-07-09104180516
2026-07-09106183525
2026-07-09108185537
2026-07-09110185543
2026-07-10110185543
2026-07-12110185547
2026-07-12110185549
2026-07-12110185551
2026-07-13110185551
2026-07-13112187557
2026-07-13112187557
2026-07-14112187557
2026-07-14112187559

Machine-readable data

Use the exact derived output

The page and JSON routes are derived from the same deterministic statistics model and immutable checkpoint history.